blog posts

What’s missing from the missional conversation?

In the last 10-20 years we have all benefitted from the ongoing conversation that’s been happening around us, forcing us back to the scriptures and evaluating how we continue to BE the church of Jesus Christ. One of the more helpful things that has come out of this discussion (one among many things) is the need for contextual mission, creating a posture as we go as SENT-ones instead of always asking people to come to us.

As we think about being sent and contextualization, the Gospel of Jesus and the particular ways in which we function as the church need to be contextually appropriate to the crack or crevice of society we are called to. Urban Chicago is quite different from Greenwich, CT. Perhaps a seismic revelation for many people is that we all need to see ourselves as missionaries and contextualize our ministry appropriately.

But I think in the midst of all of this, at least in my experience, it’s important to hold in tension that while there are particulars in each culture, there are still also universals that span every culture. In academic language, it is called the universal anthropological constant.

There are certain things that transcend all cultures, ethnicities, time zones and upbringings. There are certain things that are a stabilized constant in every single culture on the face of the planet. It doesn’t matter if you visit New York, Beirut or Beijing. You’ll find the same things at work in every strata of society. They aren’t contextual things. They are universals.

And if we are to be faithful missionaries, we probably need to know what some of those things are that make human beings…human beings. Because if we are able to hold loosely in our hands the ability to see the universals at work in culture as well as finding the particulars as we contextualize, we will probably see some truly extraordinary things.

But rather than leave it at that, let me give you a THREE things that I believe are examples of some of these constants. This isn’t meant to be exhaustive, but simply a place to start the conversation:

Defined discipling language.
It is a constant in every single culture that language creates culture. Every culture has a vernacular that not only allows them to communicate effectively, but the language itself shapes what the culture is. It’s an incredible phenomenon. Furthermore, you can see in every great missional movement in the last 2000 years that they had a shared language (and therefore practice) of discipleship. With something like LifeShapes, the discipling language we use, we’ve found a way of transcending cultures because the language is image based, which is why it works in a penthouse of Manhattan and the mountains of Nepal. But having a language is the key. Do you have a defined discipling language?

The Four Spaces of human interaction.
There are only four and every human being in the world is wired to live in all four of these spaces. Intimate space: shared with only 2-3 people (usually a husband/wife). Personal Space: shared with 6-12 people (often represented in the nuclear family). Social Space: 20-50 people (often represented in the extended family). Public Space: 75+ people (think football games, worship services, concerts, etc). Every human has people and places where they interact with these spaces. But by and large, the Western church has lost sight of the Social Space. It isn’t that people stop functioning in tight knit, extended family groups of 20-50. In fact, what anthropologists have found is that people recreate this space if it is missing. It’s that we have stopped being involved with them there. And here is the universal constant key: In every culture on earth, on every single city and continent, it is were human IDENTITY is found. So I’m not saying you have to do Missional Communities. That’s not the constant. But knowing how to use that space seems pretty important. By the same token, there is still a need for the Public Space gathering. Whenever the church has been able to meet publicly in groups larger than 70 for the last 2000 years, it has chosen to do so. Of course tradition plays into that some, but it’s also a wiring that human beings have. We are wired to join with larger groups of people to locate ourselves in a bigger story.

How people learn
I’ve spent some time on this one before, but it’s worth mentioning again. While receiving Information is an incredibly important part of learning, it is only a piece of the process. The three universals of learning seem to be: Information based (think lecture hall), Apprenticeship (think how a wood worker passes his trade to his son) and Immersion into culture (think how a infant/toddler learns to speak). Yet in the Western world we’ve bought into a strange misunderstanding that says to know ABOUT something (information) is the same thing as knowing how to do it. For instance, that talking about ABOUT the theology of mission is the same things as knowing how to effectively do mission. But we’re missing some important learning steps in how human beings are designed. Want to make disciples who can make disciples? Want to multiply missional leaders and release them? GREAT. Where is the Information, Apprenticeship and Immersion?

 

I could probably list off quite a number of these, but how about you guys out there? What are some other universals you see at work that span culture?

 

 

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

5 Responses to What’s missing from the missional conversation?

  1. Ben Sternke 2012/08/06 at 9:02 am #

    Good stuff! I think in the midst of all the great talk about contextualization there needs to be a counter-balance of talk about universality.

  2. Blakely Page 2012/08/06 at 12:13 pm #

    Food and family

    Everyone eats, everyone has some relationship with food be it indulgence or survivial food is human.

    Everyone has some relationship to a family be it abandonded by one or smothered by one (an all versions in between). Humans understand some element of family even if it is the longing for one or the mess of one.

  3. mike anderson 2012/08/06 at 2:24 pm #

    Another universal i see that spans culture is “ownership”. People will commit to, be a part, give to, make time for, enthusiastically support things they have personal ownership in. Specifically in the church when the members think they they are paying religious professionals to do the work of ministry a passive culture is created completely opposite of the movement Jesus started with his disciples.

    Martin Luther picked up on this in the Reformation with the Priesthood of All Believers. He saw the split between paid professionals and passive pew sitters and realized that this did not even come close to how Paul taught on how the church should operate. Ala Ephesians 4. In Ephesians 4 it is clear that the leaders of the church are charged with equipping everyone to see their particular place of service/ownership in the body of Christ. No Church is fully functioning until every member is engaged in the work of mission through the local church using their gifts, passions, talents and personalities in a life of meaningful service. Churches that get this grow radically and they don’t have trouble getting volunteers begging people to tithe or get involved. Serving/Ownership is contagious and creates a culture where everybody is rowing together toward the finish line!

    • James P. Bell 2012/08/07 at 3:40 am #

      While I appreciate your point about ownership and heartily agree that church members are more enthusiastic about committing to what they feel is their own, I am getting tired of hearing the constant theme of “paid professionals” causing members to be passive pew sitters.

      I am a “paid pastor”. I am also called to lead people about whom I deeply care. Ephesians 4 is my inspiration for developing ministry among our people. I go with them to apartments, schools and street ministry. I also preach to them on Sunday mornings.

      Like most of the pastors I know, I’m not paid as much as I would probably make on a secular job. But I feel called to lead. I will gladly sacrifice to help people grow spiritually. So I am weary of the never ending whining from those who seem to resent church buildings, church leaders, or just about anything other than grape-nuts shared around the kitchen table at some home group that exults in not being in bondage to a church.

      People need leadership. Corporate worship is powerful. Churches are shaping and changing lives across this nation. Don’t let insecurity, rejection or past failures cause you to resent leaders (even if they are paid and hopefully professional) and resort to being Ephesians 4 wannabees who mostly offend or become irrelevant.

  4. Kelly 2012/08/06 at 10:38 pm #

    Every culture rears children. I think you can observe much information by watching a culture interact with their children and raise them. Child-rearing speaks to much of what the husband/wife, family, extended family, and community believes. It gets quickly to the core of matters. It goes deep.

Leave a Reply

Connect with: