blog posts
Can MEGA be missional?
We live in a world of earthquakes.
Sure, there are real, physical, seismic changes happening underneath our feet. But there are cultural, social, political and religious earthquakes rumbling around us each and every day. In fact, it’s been 60-70 years of these kinds of earthquakes. And like all tall buildings, when the institutions such as marriage, the church, finances or politics crash down around us, not only do we find ourselves leery to enter into these institutions again, but it creates a sea of victims.
In times of disaster, these victims, still afraid to go back into the buildings and institutions that have fallen on them, often gather together in Refugee Camps. People are disoriented. Afraid. Unsure of what’s next or how to live anymore. Their whole world has collapsed around them.
Let’s extend this metaphor a bit further to the church.
In my opinion, mega-churches are a direct consequence of the upheaval in our culture, essentially functioning as Refugee Camps for the people of God.
As you can quickly see in this scenario, refugee camps can be a problem if people become dependent on the systems of support provided. But they can also be brilliant if they exist to equip and train people for how life now is and then send them out to the other victims of the earthquake.
We’ve seen places like the Sudan and Kenyan refugee camps work really well. People rebooted their lives and are then sent out to rebuild community and life outside of the camp.
And while people with varying opinions on mega-churches may not articulate it this way, here’s the underlying question: Are we building a refugee camp or a rescue team?
It seems that many would argue Refugee Camp.
But here’s the thing that most people don’t see: It has nothing to do with size. It’s simply the culture of the Western church (or more rightly put…things intrinsic to American culture that pervade the church).
I’m not going to belabor this point. I feel like JR Rozko did an excellent job in this post. His same point was that it’s not about size, it’s that so many churches have these characteristics:
- Celebrity-driven culture
- Sunday centricity
- Consumer oriented structures
- Inward-focused financial structures
- Seating over sending
But you can have 100 people and be all about these things, can’t you?
Here’s my point: If we applaud church plants, small or medium-sized churches who are learning to embrace an orientation around discipleship and mission, we need to do the same for mega-churches.
In my work at 3DM, probably 1 out of every 15 churches we work with is a mega-church. And as my relationships deepen with many of these leaders, increasingly I have been filled with more hope than ever before by the men and women I meet who are leaders in these churches. I cannot speak for all mega-church pastors, but I can speak for the ones who have become close friends through our Learning Community process. These friends are seeking the Lord, discerning how to shift something that can often feel 50 times bigger than the Titanic. They are having to make tough and difficult choices and commit to a way of being the church that will take more than a year or two or some silver bullet new program.
G.K. Chesterton put it this way: “If something is worth doing, it’s worth doing badly.”
If churches are making transitions from Refugee Camps to Rescue Teams, that’s going to take some time. It’s not as if you wake up the next morning and are brilliant at it, particularly when, for some, it includes a shift in ecclesiology. They won’t figure it out over night. But it’s the commitment to something worth doing and the acceptance that you may not be great at it for a while that builds the character necessary for doing it long-term. You have to live into it.
Isn’t that something we should be hoping for? Cheering for? Praying for?
Don’t we want leaders with courage, conviction, a willingess to try, experiment, tweak and seek the voice of the Lord? Hasn’t that always been the heartbeat of the church? So whether it’s a church of 100 or a church of 25,000, if a church is committed to going after discipleship that leads to mission, lets us “encourage them as long as it is called today.” Let us give them the grace that it will take to do this journey well.
And with integrity, let us make it ourselves.
It is true that not every church is on this journey. That’s a reality. But at the very least, we can make the journey ourselves and encourage and pray for those communities who are.
About Mike Breen
Subscribe
Enter your email address to subscribe to Mike's blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
2 Responses to Can MEGA be missional?
Leave a Reply Click here to cancel reply.
TOP BLOG POSTS
FREE online 5-fold ministry survey
How I Chose Movement over Mega | The Story of Sheffield
Misional Communities Series
Obituary for the American Church
The "Secret Sauce" for our Churches
The difference between Huddles and Small Groups...and why so many churches use both
Mike’s Twitter Feed
Follow @Mike_Breen on Twitter
Recent Comments
- JR Rozko on Can MEGA be missional?
- Aaron Coury on Can MEGA be missional?
- Ben Thorp on Why I’ve started a local worship service
- Brian West on Why I’ve started a local worship service
- Why I’ve started a local worship service | Mike Breen on Why I’m not using the word “Attractional” anymore

















Well said. I too am continually impressed with the openness by some of these established mega churches to sit under and take the posture of student. The size doesn’t matter, it’s the heart of the people. Passion is contagious, and when passion for Jesus’ mission collides with willing and open hearts, lives, cities and countries change.
Thanks for your life and ministry, and thanks for allowing me to serve alongside you in Cincinnati.
Thanks for pointing to my post here in yours Mike. As I’ve continued to think and reflect on this, I think there a problem in the question, or, not really with the question, but with how people typically interpret the question.
Often, I think the thinking is that if the final answer to the question of “Can mega be missional?” is yes, then I can receive “missional” as something to add to what we are already doing. It means I don’t have to contemplate if there are factors at work undergirding the entire edifice of church-as-I-know-it that have to be called into question.
Because I know of no chuches that are 2K+ in size that are not predicated on at least several of the 5 marks that I described, I see this as a major problem (note - I am not saying that none of these exist, just that I am not familiar with any). This being the case, the question of “can mega be missional?” strikes me as the sort of question that the religious leaders would have brought to Jesus - a clever way of trying to pigeon hole him. Doubtless, he would have told a story or offered a counter question that would have upended their presuppositions and lack of imagination. He would have skillfully showed them how they had no real capacity to receive what he would have offered them because they were not yet willing to be open-handed about their true treasure. Sadly, I am less skillful here, but I am convinced it”s the sort of work we need to do.
I get the refugee camp metaphor and think it has legs, but here’s where I think they might run out. Refugee camps and rescue missions are structures of a different sort, but both good and necessary things. Not so in terms of what we are talking about with the church here. A church marked by the 5 things above is never a good or necessary thing. Thus, the trajectory isn’t a simple move from a good-but-provisional structure (refugee camp) to another good-but-permanent structure (rescue mission). It’s a move from a less-than-faithful way of being the church (predicated on faulty theology and ecclesiology) to a more faithful way of being the Church.
I could not be more with you in terms of wanting to encourage and celebrate wherever we see people journeying toward centering on issues of discipleship and mission. But I also want to set people up for success by helping them to “count the cost” of that journey. Those most inclined to ask, “Can mega be missional?” are often those least prepared to receive that the answer entails dying to the posture of self-preservation implicit in that question.