blog posts

The Gospel in an Age of Optional Discipleship

Been working on a white paper that 3DM and The Order of Mission is releasing in a few weeks that has me thinking about the Gospel quite a bit, lately. Here is a quick excerpt from it:

Currently, more than 50% of the people living in the United States claim to be Christians. But we don’t see millions and millions of Jesus-like people running around; rather, we see the byproduct of a society of people who increasingly don’t know Jesus and live in his way of life. It’s not the absence of church-goers that leaves us with the problems we are now facing. Church-goers abound. It is the absence of disciples. This fact is more poignant when we see how Christians have transformed society for the good in the past.

Consider the following quote from Rodney Stark about the early disciples:

Christianity revitalized life in Greco-Roman cities by providing new norms and new kinds of social relationships able to cope with urgent urban problems. To cities filled with the homeless and impoverished, Christianity offered charity as well as hope. To cities filled with newcomers and strangers, Christianity offered an immediate basis for attachments. To cities filled with orphans and widows, Christianity provided a new and expanded sense of family. To cities torn by violent ethnic strife, Christianity offered a new basis for social solidarity. And to cities faced with epidemics, fires, and earthquakes, Christianity offered effective nursing services.

This is an expression of what it looks like when discipleship is at the center of a Christian movement. Sadly, this is not the reality we find ourselves in. We find ourselves in churches with people who call themselves Christians but, by-and-large, are not living as disciples. Our society is in the state it’s in because we have abdicated our calling as Christians. We are to blame.

That’s the excerpt…we’ll be releasing the whole paper in a few weeks…

It’s had my thoughts fixated on what this says about the Gospel. Can it be simply coincidental that when people heard the Gospel in the early church, they become disciples of Jesus…but when people hear the Gospel today in the United States, they believe discipleship is optional?

Is it possible (just give me possible) that we are articulating a different Gospel than the one of the disciples and the early church?

And if it’s possible…

What do you think the differences might be?

 

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Subscribe

Enter your email address to subscribe to Doug's blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

2 Responses to The Gospel in an Age of Optional Discipleship

  1. Craig 2012/10/25 at 3:52 pm #

    It’s possible. But I think something assumed, something so obvious as to hardly need explaining in the early church, changed after Constantine. The context of gospel proclamation probably changed - not overnight, but drastically. I’m recalling the explanation offered by D. James Kennedy in his “Evangelism Explosion” workbook. Perhaps a surge of both converts and those who merely wanted to jump on a new religious bandwagon overwhelmed the Church’s ability to disciple. That might explain the origin of a quite passive Christian religiosity/superstition for the masses divided from monks & priests. Some discipleship continued, but never on the scale necessary or expected in the early church. Possible?

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Morning Links (October 27, 2012) | Justin Hiebert - 2012/10/27

    [...] Doug Paul writes about the Gospel in an age of optional discipleship. [...]

Leave a Reply

Connect with: